Press "Enter" to skip to content

US celebrates Indian-American legal expert Neel Katyal after winning ‘most important constitutional case in US history 2023

Story

Neel Katyal
Neel Katyal An Indian-American lawyer is being hailed as a “national hero” and a “true patriot” after successfully arguing a case before the Supreme Court, in what legal experts say is possibly the best case in American history.

 

Neel Katyal An Indian-American lawyer is being hailed as a “national hero” and a “true patriot” after successfully arguing a case before the Supreme Court, in what legal experts say is possibly the best case in American history.

It is an important constitutional matter. US-born Neel Katyal, representing the watchdog group Common Cause, won a 6-3 decision from the Supreme Court on Monday that struck down the primacy of state legislatures over the courts to determine election rules, which are pro-Trump. was a marginal legal doctrine promoted by conservatives. Cynical attempt to grab power.

The court’s decision in the Moore v. Harper case kicked off what was emerging as a radical change to US election laws, giving state legislatures the right to set rules for federal elections, without oversight. The so-called independent state legislature doctrine, advanced by the Republican-dominated North Carolina state legislature, was rejected by three liberal justices along with three conservatives, who ruled that the US Constitution does not insulate state legislative actions from review by state courts, And its power is constrained by the federal and state constitutions.

Top legal and constitutional scholars held their breath as the verdict came, with even former President Barack Obama, himself a legal scholar, cheering the decision. “Today, the Supreme Court rejected the marginal independent state legislature doctrine that threatened to erode our democracy and our system of checks and balances. This judgment rejects that far-fetched doctrine, that threatened to undermine our democracy, and makes it clear that the courts can continue to protect voter rights in North Carolina and in every state, Obama tweeted.

He is said to have argued more cases (about 50) before the US Supreme Court than any minority lawyer, and broke the record held by the legendary Thurgood Marshall.

Tweeted celebrating the verdict, “Thank you two great Americans and brilliant legal minds @neal_katyal and ?@judgeluttig #SupremeCourt #USAWins.” Judge Luttig, a distinguished jurist who was also involved in the fight, described it as “about 250 The most important constitutional case for American democracy since the nation’s founding years ago”. He later said that Katyal “made the best oral argument ever made before the Supreme Court of the United States.

He was skilled!” He went to Dartmouth College and earned a law degree at Yale, where he studied under Akhil Amar, another distinguished Indian-American constitutional scholar. He is currently a partner in the law firm Hogan Lovells and teaches national security law at Georgetown University Law Center, where he is one of the youngest professors to receive tenure and chair professorships in university history.

Source link   |   World News   

Short Intro of Neel Katyal

Personal Details

Born:Neal Kumar Katyal March 12, 1970 (age 53),Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
Political party:Democratic
Education : Dartmouth College (BA), Yale University (JD)

Career and Professional

Neal Kumar Katyal (born March 12, 1970) is an American corporate lawyer and academic. He is a partner at Hogan Lovells and the Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center. During the Obama administration, Katyal served as Acting Solicitor General of the United States from May 2010[4] until June 2011. Previously, Katyal served as an attorney in the Solicitor General’s office, and as Principal Deputy Solicitor General in the U.S. Justice Department. As of 2022, he is a partner of Chamath Palihapitiya Social+capital Partnership and a member of the board of Social Capital Ventures Inc.

Katyal has argued more U.S. Supreme Court cases than any other minority lawyer in American history. He has described himself as an “extremist centrist”.[8] While he has been widely praised as one of the United States’s leading attorneys, he has been criticized by progressives for arguing against human rights and workers’ rights in cases such as Janus v. AFSCME, Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, and Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *